"Dieci versioni della stessa scena" 40 anni dopo:

Comprendere e insegnare il concetto di paesaggio

Autori

  • Benedetta Castiglioni Department of Historical and Geographic Sciences and the Ancient World, University of Padua, Italy
  • Theano S. Terkenli Università dell'Egeo
  • Marcello Tanca Department of Literature, Languages and Heritage, University of Cagliari, Italy

Abstract

Questo contributo concerne l'importanza di affrontare il concetto di paesaggio, e su come insegnarlo, in modo multidimensionale, attraverso diverse prospettive. Partendo da The Beholding Eyes: Ten Versions of the Same Scene di Meinig (1979), riflettiamo anzitutto su come questo testo sia ancora efficace come proposta per affrontare la questione del paesaggio e della sua polisemia. Le dieci idee organizzative proposte nel testo possono essere raggruppate lungo tre assi: a) l'interrelazione uomo-natura, b) il dibattito forma vs funzione e lo schema analitico ec) le prospettive umano/culturali sui significati e valori del paesaggio. Più di quattro decenni dopo, lo schema di Meinig sembra rimanere malleabile e adattabile a una serie di questioni, preoccupazioni e scopi risultanti da nuove circostanze derivanti dal cambiamento mondiale e dalla trasformazione socio-culturale.Successivamente, presentiamo un esercizio didattico impostato per un gruppo di studenti del master che parte dall'articolo di Meinig e mira ad acquisire la capacità di assumere diverse prospettive sui paesaggi. I risultati del lavoro degli studenti confermano quanto efficacemente l'esercizio raggiunga questo obiettivo. In particolare, è da notare come lo sguardo degli studenti, una volta acquisita la capacità di gestire la complessità e di prendere in considerazione la polisemia del paesaggio, si apra al futuro dei paesaggi, generando azioni consapevoli.  

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adevi A.A. and Grahn P., “Preferences for landscape: a matter of cultural determinants or innate reflexes that point to our evolutionary background?”, Landscape Research, 37, 1, 2012, pp. 27-49.

Antrop M. and Van Eetvelde V., “From teaching geography to landscape education for all”, in Jørgensen K., Karadeniz N., Mertens E. and Stiles R. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Teaching Landscape, London-New York, Routledge, 2019, pp. 31-44.

Appleton J., The Experience of Landscape, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1975.

Birdsall S.S., “Learning to See Landscape Through a Flexible Lens”, Journal of Geography, 102, 1, 2003, pp. 29-34.

Calcagno Maniglio A., “Landscape and education”, in Council of Europe, Landscape Dimensions. Reflections and Proposals for the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing, 2017, pp. 55-120.

Castiglioni B., “Education on landscape for children”, in Council of Europe, Landscape facets. Reflections and proposals for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing, 2012, pp. 217-267.

Castiglioni B., Paesaggio e società. Una prospettiva geografica, Rome, Carocci, 2022.

Castiglioni B. and Cisani M., “The complexity of landscape ideas and the issue of landscape democracy in school and non-formal education: exploring pedagogical practices in Italy”, Landscape Research, 47, 2, 2022, pp. 142-154.

Castiglioni B., Cisani M. and Piccolo M., “Camminare nel paesaggio come pratica educativa: prospettive geografiche”, Studium educationis, XXI, 1, 2020, pp. 65-81.

Cosgrove D., Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1998.

Dematteis G., “La fertile ambiguità del paesaggio geografico”, in Ortalli G. (Ed.), Le trasformazioni del paesaggio e il caso veneto, Bologna, il Mulino, 2010, pp. 151-173.

Herzog T.R., Herbert E.J., Kaplan R. and Crooks C.L., “Cultural and Developmental Comparisons of Landscape Perceptions and Preferences”, Environment and Behavior, 32, 2000, pp. 323-346.

Jackson J.B., Discovering the Vernacular Landscape, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.

Leibniz G.W., Political Writings (translated and edited with an Introduction and notes by Patrick Riley), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Leibniz G.W., Monadology (A New Translation and Guide to Lloyd Strickland), Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

Lothian A., “Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?” Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 1, 1999, pp. 177-198.

Lowenthal D., “Geography, experience, and imagination: towards a geographical epistemology”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 51, 3, 1961, pp. 241-260.

Luginbühl Y., “Le paysage aujourd’hui et son enseignement”, L’Information Géographique, 60, 1, 1996, pp. 20-29.

Luginbühl Y., La mise en scène du monde. Construction du paysage européen, Paris CNRS, 2012.

Meinig D.W., “The beholding eye. Ten versions of the same scene”, in Meinig D.W. (Ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979a, pp. 33-48.

Meinig D.W. (Ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979b.

Olwig K.R., “The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention”, Landscape Research, 32, 5, 2007, pp 579-594.

Olwig K.R., The Meanings of Landscape: Essays on Place, Space, Environment and Justice, New York, Routledge, 2019.

Palmer J.F., “Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 1-2, 1997, pp. 109-113.

Pavlis E., “Towards a Geographical Approach to Spatial Conscience and Application in Landscape: The Case of the Greek Countryside”, Ph.D. Thesis, Mytilene, University of the Aegean, 2012.

Purcell A.T., Lamb R.J., Mainardi Peron E. and Falchero S., “Preference or preferences for landscape?”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 3, 1994, pp. 195-209.

Sevenant M. and Antrop M., “Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes”, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 9, 2009, pp. 2889-2899.

Spirn A.W., “Restoring Mill Creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice and city planning and design”, Landscape Research, 30, 3, 2005, pp. 395-413.

Tress B. and Tress G., “Capitalizing on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 3-4, 2001, pp. 143-157.

Tuan Y.F., “Thought and landscape: the eye and the mind’s eye”, in Meinig D.W. (Ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979, pp. 89-102.

Turri E., Il paesaggio come teatro, Venice, Marsilio, 1998.

Turri E., Il paesaggio e il silenzio, Venice, Marsilio, 2004.

Zube E.H. and Pitt D.G., “Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage landscapes”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 8, 1, 1981, pp. 69-87.

Zube E.H., Sell J.L. and Taylor J.G., “Landscape perception: research, application and theory”, Landscape Planning, 9, 1, 1982, pp. 1-33.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2022-12-20

Fascicolo

V. 2 (2022)

Sezione

Learning Landscapes ed. by Benedetta Castiglioni, Marcello Tanca

Licenza

The Author assigns to the Nuova Cultura and to Italian Association of Geography Teachers all rights under copyright that can exist in and to the submitted paper. The Author warrants that the paper and images (photos, maps, graphs etc.) are original and that he/she is the Author of the submitted contribution and its parts; in the case of images taken by other publications, the Author must provide a specific authorization and must pay in advance any copyright.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.