Encouraging Finnish early childhood education student teachers to sense their everyday environments through photo-walks

Authors

  • Markus Hilander Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

This article addresses the persistent challenge in early childhood teacher education of moving beyond nature–human dualisms toward more relational, posthumanistic understandings of the environment. To examine how such thinking can be fostered, the study investigates a photo‑walk assignment completed by 104 Finnish early childhood education student teachers, who produced 55 essays and accompanying photographs reflecting on their immediate surroundings. Using reflexive thematic analysis, the study explores how the student teachers interpreted their photo‑walk experiences, which environmental education themes they drew upon and what conceptual or practical difficulties emerged. The findings show that when student teachers meaningfully engaged with the task, they identified nonhuman traces, material and sensory invitations and metaphoric re‑worldings that decentred human agency. The essays also highlighted inquiry‑based exploration, multispecies relations, sensory and seasonal awareness and the pedagogical potential of everyday urban environments. However, the analysis also revealed conceptual misunderstandings of posthumanism, a tendency toward aestheticised landscape photography and challenges in operationalising relational noticing. The study concludes that photo‑walks can support the development of environmental sensitivity and more‑than‑human awareness, but explicit pedagogical scaffolding is needed. These insights offer practical implications for designing learning activities that strengthen relational, multisensory and place‑based approaches in early childhood education.

References

Baryosef Paz N. and Gan D., “A comprehensive approach to teacher training: Fostering ecohumanism and holism through outdoor learning, art and lite-rature”, Environmental Education Research, 2026.

Bayne S., “Posthumanism: A navigation aid for educators”, on_education – Journal for Research and Debate, 2, 1, 2018, pp. 1-7.

Bonato, M., “In/out of China: Exercising positionality through mental maps”, J-READING (Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography), 14, 2, 2025, pp. 83-99.

Braidotti R., “A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities”, Theory, Culture & Society, 36, 6, 2019 pp. 31-61.

Braun V. and Clarke V., “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 2006, pp. 77-101.

Braun V. and Clarke V., “Thematic analysis”, in Cooper H., Camic P.M., Long D.L., Panter A.T., Rindskopf D. and Sher K.J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, 2: Research designs, Washington, American Psychological Association, 2012, pp. 57-71.

Braun V. and Clarke V., “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis”, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11, 4, 2019, pp. 589-597.

Braun V. and Clarke V., “One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 3, 2021, 328-352.

Byman J., “Speculative fabulation and lingering with multispecies worlds in environmental education”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 2026.

Chartrand M-È., “Unearthing forest pedagogies: Autoethnographic encounters within critical forest studies”, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 2026, pp. 1-12.

Chawla L., “Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss”, People and Nature, 2, 2020, pp. 619-642.

Finnish National Agency for Education, National core curriculum for early childhood education and care 2022, Helsinki, Finnish National Agency for Education, 2022.

Fox N.J. and Alldred P., “Sustainability, feminist posthumanism and the unusual capacities of (post)humans”, Environmental Sociology, 6, 2, 2020, pp. 121-131.

Giacomelli L. and Pesaresi C., “A journey through time into the ‘real world’ of ancient Pompeii: The 79 AD eruption of Vesuvius relived to raise risk awareness and as an opportunity for experiential learning”, J-READING (Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography), 14, 2, 2025, pp. 5-31.

Heikkinen H.L.T., Huttunen R., Mahon K. and Kemmis S., “Beyond an anthropocentric view of praxis: Towards education for planetary well being”, Environmental Education Research, 30, 7, 2024, pp. 1147-1160.

Hilander M., “Finnish early childhood education student teachers’ mental images of the environment”, Education Sciences, 13, 12, 1206, 2023, pp. 1-15.

Hilander M., Särkelä E. and Tani S., “Photography in enhancing pre-service teachers’ environmental sensitivity: Urban everyday environments in geography education”, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2025.

Hilander M. and Tani S., “Meaningful encounters with the built environment as the basis for urban environmental education”, Education Sciences, 12, 3, 203, 2022, pp. 1-14.

Iared V.G. and Venturi T., “Eco-phenomenology as a link between the fields of environmental education and health education”, Qualitative Research Journal, 2026.

Jordan K.E. and Jónsson Ó.P., “Towards posthuman climate change education”, Journal of Moral Education, 54, 1, 2025, pp. 44-63.

Kaasinen T. and Kervinen A., “Multisensory noticing in early childhood environmental encounters”, Environmental Education Research, 2025.

Kervinen A., Hohti R., Rautio P., Saari M. H., Tammi T. and Aivelo T., “Ratty places: Unsettling human-centeredness in ecological inquiry with young people”, Environmental Education Research, 30, 7, 2024, pp. 1129-1146.

Kim M., “Fostering environmental sensitivity by observing everyday environments”, Journal of Geography, 118, 4, 2019, pp. 157-168.

Kopnina H., “Exploring posthuman ethics: Opening new spaces for postqualitative inquiry within pedagogies of the circular economy”, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 3-4, 2022, pp. 361-374.

Kuo M., Barnes M. and Jordan C., “Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship”, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305, 2019, pp. 1-9.

Kurle C.M., Cadotte M.W., Seo M., Dooner P. and Jones H.P., “Considering humans as integral components of ‘nature’”, Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 4, e12220, 2023.

Lenz Taguchi H., “ ‘This is not a photograph of a fetus’: A feminist reconfiguration of the concept of posthumanism as the ultrasoundfetusimage”, Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 9, 2017, pp. 699-710.

Miele M. and Bear C., “Posthumanism and geography”, in Warf B. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human geography, Cham, Springer, 2025, pp. 1020-1024.

Pacini-Ketchabaw V., Taylor A. and Blaise M., “Decentring the human in multispecies ethnographies”, in Taylor C.A. and Hughes C. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 149-167.

Pyyry N., “ ‘Sensing with’ photography and ‘thinking with’ photographs in research into teenage girls’ hanging out”, Children’s Geographies, 13, 2, 2015, pp. 149-163.

Pyyry N., Hilander M. and Tani S., “Photography and photo elicitation as visual methods”, in von Benzon N., Holton M., Wilkinson C. and Wilkinson S. (Eds.), Creative methods for human geographers, London, Sage, 2021, pp. 75-86.

Pyyry N., Kaakinen I. and Willman K., “Asuminen on osallistumista: Kodin laajentuminen kaupunkitilaan puutarha-hankkeissa” (Dwelling as participation: The expansion of home into urban space through garden projects), in Bäcklund P., Häkli J. and Schulman H. (Eds.), Kansalaiset kaupunkia kehittämässä (Citizens in urban development), Tampere, Tampere University Press, 2017, pp. 260-278.

Pyyry N. and Tani S., “More-than-human playful politics in young people’s practices of dwelling with the city”, Social & Cultural Geography, 20, 9, 2019, pp. 1218-1232.

Rautio P., “Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life”, Children’s Geographies, 11, 4, 2013, pp. 394-408.

Rautio P., “Following a local guide”, 2025, https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pauliina-rautio-animate_1-valitse-l%C3%A4ht% C3%B6paikka-2-etsi-itsellesi-activity-7205434178090315776-c-4X?utm_source= share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABeOVJEBs_kZz54O_yuZFNlSrU-CopkRFks.

Rautio P., Hohti R., Leinonen R.-M. and Tammi T., “Reconfiguring urban environmental education with ‘shitgull’ and a ‘shop’”, Environmental Education Research, 23, 10, 2017, pp. 1379-1390.

Raymond C.M., Kyttä M. and Stedman R., “Sense of place, fast and slow: The potential contributions of affordance theory to sense of place”, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1674, 2017, pp. 1-14.

Riley K., Jukes S. and Rautio P., “Relational ontologies and multispecies worlds: Trans-disciplinary possibilities for environmental education”, Australian Journal of Environ-mental Education, 40, 2, 2024, pp. 95-107.

Rose G., Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials, London, Sage, 2023.

Roy A. “Decolonising environmental education: Forest narratives in Sheela Tomy’s Valli (2022)”, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 2026, pp. 1-14.

Sidebottom K. and Mycroft L., “Birdsong: Pedagogies of attunement and surrender with more than human teachers, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 2024, pp. 143-156.

Stables A., “Environmental ethics and ontologies: Humanist or posthumanist? The case for constrained pluralism”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54, 4, 2020, pp. 888-899.

Tani S., “The environments of learning environments: What could/should geography education do with these concepts, J-READING (Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography), 2, 2013, pp. 7-16.

Taylor C.A. and Hughes C. (Eds.), “Posthuman research practices in education”, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles