Peculiarities of urban spatial cognition. A pilot study on the relationship of quantitative elements of mental maps and perceived success in navigation
Abstract
During a single-event pilot data collection participants (n=48) were asked to draw their mental maps both in the style of Milgram (Milgram and Jodelet, 1970) and Lynch (1960), and to fill out a background survey and the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (Hegarty et al., 2002). This study focuses on the quantitative analysis of the Milgram style mental maps (Milgram and Jodelet, 1970), which relies solely on landmarks, the sense of direction scale results, and the background survey is included. The study is a pilot, with the aim of exploring the combined potential of the aforementioned tools. The results suggest that there is a correlation between one’s sense of direction and the inner well-structuredness of their mental map. It can also be stated that the way someone travels in a city and the opportunities for observing the environment affects the detailedness of their mental (and probably cognitive) maps, specifically the number of landmarks shown. In addition, the elements of the mental maps might imply that using only landmarks is a less organic mental mapping method compared to Lynch’s method which uses five element types. However, due to the small sample size the results cannot be seen as representative, and to validate these results a data collection with a bigger sample should be made, with a possibly more elaborate background survey.References
Agrestini A., Colleoni M., Mangiatordi A., Malatesta S., Nuvolati G., Squarcina E. and Zuccoli F., “From mental maps to art: A project on the university-bicocca sense of place”, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2023, pp. 1201-1209.
Chiodo J.J., “Improving the Cognitive Development of Students’ Mental Maps of the World”, Journal of Geography, 96, 3, 1997, pp. 153-163.
Didelon-Loiseau C., de Ruffray S. and Lambert N., “Mental maps of global regions: identifying and characterizing “hard” and “soft” regions”, Journal of Cultural Geography, 35, 2, 2018, pp. 210-229.
Epstein R.A., Patai E.Z., Julian J.B. and Spiers H.J., “The cognitive map in humans: Spatial navigation and beyond”, Nature Neuroscience, 20, 11, 2017, pp. 1504-1513.
Golledge R.G., “Cognitive Maps”, in Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, San Diego, Academic Press Inc., 2002.
Golledge R.G. and Gärling T., “Cognitive Maps and Urban Travel”, in Hensher D.A., Button K.J., Haynes K.E. and Stopher P.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, 2004, pp. 501-512.
Gould P.R. and White R., Mental Maps, Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1974.
Hegarty M., Richardson A.E., Montello D.R., Lovelace K. and Subbiah I., “Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability”, Intelligence, 30, 5, 2002, pp. 425-447.
Jász B., “Mental map of the city: Elements of visual argumentation and creativity in modern city planning”, Creativity Studies, 11, 2, 2018, pp. 284-293.
Jász B., “How Does the Pandemic Invalidate the Sociological Definition of the City?”, in Methi J.S. and Nikiforova B. (Eds.), Borderology. Key Challenges in Geography, Cham, Springer, 2023.
Kiss J. and Bajmócy P., “Egyetemi Hallgatók Mentális Térképei Magyarországról”, Tér És Társadalom, 10, 2-3, 1996, pp. 55-8.
Kitchin R, “Cognitive Maps: What are They and Why Study Them?”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 1, 1994, pp. 1-19.
Kozlowski L.T. and Bryant K.J., “Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 4, 1977, pp. 590-598.
Lynch K., The image of the city, MIT Press, 1960.
Milgram S. and Jodelet D., “Psychological Maps of Paris”, in Proshansky H.M. et al. (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: People and their Physical Setting, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.
Montello D.R., “Scale and multiple psychologies of space”, in Frank A.U. and Campari I. (Eds.), Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Proceedings of COSIT ’93, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp. 312-321.
Montello D.R. and Golledge R.G., Scale and detail in the cognition of geographic information, Report of the Specialist Meeting of Project Varenius, Santa Barbara, University of California-Santa Barbara, 1999.
Musolino D., “The mental maps of Italian entrepreneurs: a qualiquantitative approach”, Mental Maps, 2021, pp. 95-117.
Piccardi L., Risetti M. and Nori R., “Familiarity and Environmental Representations of a City: A Self-Report Study”, Psychological Reports, 109, 1, 2011, pp. 309-326.
Rosyida F., Sholikhah W. and Sari U.A., “Mental mapping: Viewing the school environment of the mind”, 1st International Conference on Geography and Education (ICGE 2016), Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 344-348.
Saarinen T.F., “Classics in human geography revisited: commentary”, Progress in Human Geography, 19, 1995, pp. 107-108.
Saarinen T.F. and Maccabe C.L., “World Patterns of Geographic Literacy Based on Sketch Map Quality”, Professional Geogra-pher, 47, 2, 1995, pp. 196-204.
Sebastián J.B., Ordinas Garau A. and Ruiz Pérez M., “Assessing geography knowledge in primary education with mental map analysis: a Balearic Islands case study”, Educational Studies, 50, 1, 2024, pp. 1-22.
Sholl M.J., Acacio J.C., Makar R.O. and Leon C., “The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment”, Journal of Environ-mental Psychology, 20, 2000, pp. 17-28.
Sugimoto M., Kusumi T., Nagata N. and Ishikawa T., “Online mobile map effect: How smartphone map use impairs spatial memory”, Spatial Cognition & Computation, 22, 1-2, 2021, pp. 161-183.
Tolman E.C., “Cognitive maps in rats and men”, Psychological Review, 55, 4, 1948, pp. 189-208.
Waterman S. and Gordon D., “A quantitative-comparative approach to analysis of distortion in mental maps”, The Professional Geographer, 36, 3, 1984, pp. 326-337.
White R.W., “Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence”, Psychological Review, 66, 5, 1959, pp. 297-333.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Author assigns to the Nuova Cultura and to Italian Association of Geography Teachers all rights under copyright that can exist in and to the submitted paper. The Author warrants that the paper and images (photos, maps, graphs etc.) are original and that he/she is the Author of the submitted contribution and its parts; in the case of images taken by other publications, the Author must provide a specific authorization and must pay in advance any copyright.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










